Mana Battery? Looks more like a game of Tetris to me.
Posted By:
Saxophonist
(6/2/2010 6:08:31 PM)
A horrible card, despite blues lack of mana accel. Still, in a deck with stuff like Core Tapper, Energy Chamber or Power Conduit, it could be playable.
Posted By:
majinara
(2/4/2009 9:21:44 AM)
If you don't use the charge counter it can still get you one blue mana a turn so in theory this a Island that costs 4 colorless mana so it sucks.
Posted By:
Ace8792
(2/27/2010 5:55:24 PM)
I love the artwork on this card, I don't really know why.
Posted By:
berserkberserker
(3/3/2010 9:03:14 PM)
Greavestones in the ocean?
Posted By:
divine_exodus
(9/25/2010 12:06:42 PM)
Suddenly, swirls
Posted By:
axiobeta
(8/11/2011 9:30:40 AM)
I still have no idea what the hell this cards artwork is supposed to be. it looks like a lot of green square swirls in the ocean. . . .
Posted By:
John-Bender
(11/24/2009 5:15:41 AM)
I think it's a great card, so long as you run it in a deck that will tend to be long games, or ones where you can add counters quickly and repetitively. Cards like Gilder Bairn, heck, even Surge Node is a good way of getting any mana battery to be incredibly powerful.
Posted By:
Sandboyz
(3/29/2012 8:01:56 PM)
Are you guys kidding me? This thing uses CHARGE COUNTERS y'know, the ones were you aren't supposed to use the overpriced ability on the card to get them, but along with proliferate you get plenty of free mana. Throw in a colorless deck with the rest of the batteries
Posted By:
atemu1234
(8/25/2012 8:23:07 PM)
There are only 2 things to mention here:
1. Blue needs the mana the most and this thing still sucks.
2. The art. Seriously what is that even supposed to be? Just what kind of art de***ion did they hand poor Amy Weber?
Edit- 3rd thing to discuss - Why is s-c-r-i-p-t censored?
Posted By:
TPmanW
(11/5/2012 10:16:55 PM)