x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.878 / 5  (37 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
All the rares from the early sets were put on it if they hadn't been reprinted.
Posted By: GainsBanding (2/1/2011 5:51:09 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Magic needs more Rocs. Something along the lines of absurdly big flying creatures... They'd go well in RedGreenWhite, maybe even BlueRedGreen.
Posted By: Trygon_Predator (5/9/2012 12:15:04 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


One of the top reasons why the Reserved List is stupid. Because of this card (which isn't even worth a meaningful amount of money to collectors anyway), Red can never have a 3/3 flying for 4 ever again.

Stupid, stupid, stupid. When are they going to discard the reserved list already? The people who wanted it moved on almost a decade ago; now it does nothing but hurt the game.
Posted By: Aquillion (6/30/2013 5:55:41 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Why is it on the no-reprint list?
Posted By: Superllama12 (1/31/2011 6:41:18 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Oh? I didn't know that Roc of kher ridge can be casted cheaper with Stinkdrinker Daredevil or can get boosted by sunrise sovereign and can let an ancient amphitheater come into play untaped, just like hill giant can.

Stop saying strictly better! 95% of the time you will be wrong and it makes you look like a dumb ass.
Posted By: Tommy9898 (1/14/2011 4:12:24 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Strictly better than... your face!
Posted By: Zoltantf (10/22/2011 12:46:16 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Tommy, it means the card itself is better in every way. It doesn't mean it interacts better with other cards. And it's a different creature type, so it's not strictly better, but barely.
Posted By: NeoKoda (8/16/2011 3:10:05 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Strictly better than Hill Giant.
Posted By: KicktheCAN (11/23/2010 1:16:13 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


We did not mean to get your panty's in a bundle Tommy. Giant is not the most supported tribe, and even if you are playing giants your not going to be using hill giant. So its better in almost every way then hill giant so excuse us.
Posted By: TheWrathofShane (5/5/2012 10:10:00 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0