Definately more powerful than Sylvan Scrying as this puts the land in play not into hand. Use this to fetch multilands that are forests if you need color fix.
Btw, it must tell you something that this has been discontinued but Rampant Growth is still in print. Wink, it's not because this card sucks.
Posted By:
tavaritz
(10/9/2011 5:11:35 AM)
I dunno what everyone else is complaining about I can fix some other way I will gladly pay 1 net mana to play an extra land good card. 4/5
Posted By:
JL_Weber
(12/4/2009 4:21:03 PM)
Not as powerful as Sylvan Scrying, but a nice card nonetheless.
Posted By:
TheFrostReaper
(5/2/2009 4:38:47 PM)
Good in that the land enters untapped, but it's still no Rampant Growth since it can't really colour fix.
Posted By:
2pcsofcandy
(7/5/2009 5:48:03 PM)
@tavaritz
Not better or worse than Sylvan Scrying since Sylvan Scrying lets you dig for non-basic lands, one of only two? low CMC (Primeval Titan) cards I believe that lets you do that (Expedition Map).
If you're planning on using only forests or dual-land forests, then this is better obviously, but if you're planning on using non-forests or non-basics, Sylvan Scrying is obviously better...
Posted By:
forumbrowser
(6/16/2012 9:21:01 PM)
What, putting a duel-land into play isn't color fixing?
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(6/16/2010 1:27:50 AM)
It has it's uses, none of them mine.
Posted By:
NoobOfLore
(2/22/2011 8:42:14 PM)
In mono green, this is miles ahead of rampant growth.
Posted By:
BongRipper420
(9/30/2012 6:36:03 PM)
Very powerful card, almost always better then rampant growth, unless you only have basic lands..
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(11/6/2013 2:22:35 PM)
as forumbroswer pointed out, this card cannot be considered strictly better than sylvan scrying. Sylvan scrying fetches my Gaea's Cradle, nature's lore does not. They each have their roles, and thus, each equally good in the right deck/situation.
Posted By:
Bbone37
(3/23/2014 7:57:37 AM)