x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.343 / 5  (51 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12 >
Awesome in Limited. It's psuedo-overrun in white!
Posted By: coyotemoon722 (9/6/2010 10:23:52 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


this is not a bad card. is not overrun, but instant speed makes the surprise, specially for creatures with first strike.
as damage, cmc 4 is worth for two or more creatures. i'll play it in pauper
Posted By: don_miguel (7/10/2010 7:10:55 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


this card isn't as bad as people make it seem to be.

minus trample, this is a 1 less cost 1 less power overrun imo, and the instant speed makes it pretty unpredictably deadly. excellent for white swarm decks.
Posted By: Wratharrow (7/10/2010 10:14:38 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I kinda like it. Because its a throwback to Jihad! maybe
Posted By: Kryptnyt (7/11/2010 9:10:43 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Why is that all white instants which give boosts are so overcosted and the enchantments are so cheap?
Posted By: roqbthepirate (7/9/2010 11:23:45 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This card seems overcosted to me...
Posted By: Jake1991 (7/8/2010 4:56:31 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


with glorious charge at half the cmc and -1/0, why would i pay the extra 2?
Posted By: Guntz1092 (7/15/2010 1:25:30 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Just the fact that there are no comments yet tells you enough about this card...

P.S. First

*Edit*
@Eternal_Blue

I realize M11 was just added, but most of the good cards had comments already. The fact that this card had no comments indicated what people thought of it (it's nothing to write home about).

Yea, I've added my "first" posts to some cards, the problem being...?

"ah, to be young again." I just hope I mature more than you have by the time I reach your age. Jumping on someone's comment like that doesn't make me want to grow old and wise like you.

The funny thing is, you agreed with my estimation of the card, yet you, um, still bashed me?
Posted By: VirtueVsVice (7/14/2010 11:08:02 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


The cost is too high. You would be better off paying the exact same amount and playing two Glorious Charge's.

Granted, it's less likely to have TWO Glorious Charge's in your hand, rather than one Inspired Charge. But you could also look at it this way: if you play two Glorious Charge's, an opponent would have to counter each one of them to stop you. :-)

Great artwork, though! But I must say, I found the flavor text to be bland and somewhat uninspired.
Posted By: KnightLord77 (10/15/2010 12:00:13 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


the reason it had no comments was because this whole set was JUST added to gatherer, virtuevsvice. and i wonder if you will be adding your 'first' posts to each other card in m11 as well? ... ah, to be young again.

that being said, this card is a bit overcosted and doubtless won't see play due to the other better white creature boosting cards. oh, but it's good in limited.. which means it's worthless.
Posted By: Eternal_Blue (7/10/2010 6:44:48 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0