x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 3.628 / 5  (39 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
Guassgoat, your looking at this wrong. Both versions under the curve, granted, but the fact that is removal when you need it, or a threat when you need it, make this spell very versatile. Still, its about a 3/5, I agree.
Posted By: Maraxas-of-Keld (3/16/2010 7:54:46 PM)


Not bad, although some of the other multi-cards are stronger, imho. A elephant token for 4 is strictly passable, and Assault is similar to a lot of other burn spells.

Posted By: Gaussgoat (1/16/2010 7:34:37 AM)


this spell's strength is in its versatility. The fact that this card gives you options makes it alot more useful than one would think.
Posted By: luca_barelli (3/11/2012 3:41:20 PM)


no, it's a 2. The costing is about right, but since both of them are sorceries, it ruins this cards' potential. You can't play the burn spell in response to anything, which is what makes burn spells so good. If just the red portion was an instant it would be 3 or even 3.5 stars.
Posted By: allmighty_abacus (7/30/2010 8:11:49 AM)


If only they were instants.
Posted By: Tommy9898 (2/20/2010 7:04:35 PM)


Def higher than a 2. Versitility beats speed. If you think this is a bad card, you either didnt play it, or didnt play it correctly. This was a house in invasion. Still good today, but not quite as strong. 3.5/5 Fo' Sho'
Posted By: Bbone37 (5/18/2014 12:31:45 PM)