zarakstan: that is TOTALLY the same creature. That said, how do you cut an enchantment? Clearly in twain, but still.
Posted By:
ZEvilMustache
(9/25/2010 8:34:22 AM)
Should probably cost {1}{G}{G}. The art and the flavor text are awesome. 4/5
Posted By:
DFG_Danger
(10/1/2010 9:32:39 PM)
The reports of this card's demise have been greatly exaggerated.
Posted By:
YawgmothsWish
(2/16/2012 8:54:05 PM)
very unimpressive. however, if i was making a deck based solely on resplendent artwork this would be included alongside guttural response.
Posted By:
Eternal_Blue
(9/26/2010 3:16:31 AM)
I dunno about you guys, but I heard drawing a card is better than not drawing a card =/
Im willing to spend the extra mana to get more value. In standard, I don't know if you generally need to answer their artifacts turns 1-3. The only artifact based decks this really doesn't work against is quest for the holy relic into argentum armor decks.
Posted By:
Pwnsaw
(10/9/2010 1:57:19 PM)
Twain is such an epic word.
Posted By:
NARFNra
(11/12/2010 5:47:10 PM)
Am I crazy or this art similar to that of Barter in Blood?
Posted By:
zarakstan
(9/23/2010 5:11:06 PM)
Can't argue with the costing of this card- adding a cantrip effect to a spell has traditionally costed 2 mana.
Good in limited since any artifact removal helps if you go up against the one poor soul who didn't go infect. Nice in EDH too since the extra 2 doesn't hurt as much and the extra card is handy. Too expensive and situational for serious constructed though, which is a shame.
Posted By:
Studoku
(2/23/2011 1:04:37 PM)
Not sure about running this card by itself, but possibily running this alongside with Naturalize might be a good idea considering this block. Green has no problems getting 4 mana, and removing an artifact OR enchantment, while drawing a card, seems pretty good.
4.5/5
Posted By:
LimePeel
(9/25/2010 12:11:17 AM)