I prefer Second sight. sue me.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(4/26/2011 8:05:22 AM)
Hallelujah brother, gotta make some rares suck. It's the law of balance in MTG!
Posted By:
EvilCleavage
(7/12/2010 11:57:28 PM)
only good in some situations i actually have a deck run 2-3 of these based around Omen Machine it can bring me out fatties like eldrazi by turn 5-6 but in almost any other deck is just not worth the mc 3.0
Posted By:
Sharpyarpy
(11/22/2011 2:31:25 PM)
4 mana for scy/fateseal 5? on anyone? i can see running this.
Posted By:
alucard311
(1/11/2011 5:41:54 PM)
Because rares suck sometimes
Posted By:
theDAYtheMUSICdied
(8/15/2009 3:21:23 AM)
Eh I could see a use for in a mill deck when facing an Eldrazi deck. This way you can place Emakrul on the bottom if he happens to be coming up. But the price should be waaay lower. For 1 Blue you can mill 5, so why 4 to rearrange 5?
Posted By:
Polkovnik_Skyfox
(6/20/2010 7:06:42 AM)
They're ransacking the card shop where they bought the pack with this in it.
Posted By:
PhantomDust
(12/6/2011 10:16:13 AM)
Why couldn't they have errata-ed this card to say: "Scry 5 or Fateseal 5"? That way I could have spent 5 fewer seconds reading this pirce of crap and more time reading good cards.
Posted By:
marmaris74
(8/6/2012 2:26:44 PM)
Ransack sounds like a red LD spell to me. Or Artifact destruction.
And the reason this costs four but Tome Scour costs one is because fatesealing is far more powerful than milling an opponent.
As to why it's not "fateseal 5 or scry 5" is, I believe, because that would be modal, and so wouldn't interact the same way with redirection spells. And because neither of those are ever-green.
Posted By:
NeoKoda
(8/9/2012 7:41:21 PM)
I actually love this card. When I used to play it, it often came up late in the game, and I would just leave lands on top of my opponent's deck. Every time they'd pick one up, their face would be a poem of disappointment. It doesn't mean you win, but it does mean you have fun.
Posted By:
TtothaOtothadoubleD
(1/4/2013 9:03:44 PM)