x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.977 / 5  (22 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
It's a good beat stick in a blue artifact deck.
Posted By: pigknight (1/20/2011 7:24:08 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This is a 4/4 for 4 with no drawbacks.

The only time that a deck that wants to play this would have no artifacts on the battlefield at all is post-shatterstorm.


On an unrelated note, why this is a construct and not a golem has always bug the bajeezus out of me.
Posted By: HairlessThoctar (9/10/2010 8:21:15 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


4/4 for 4 is neat, but what a stupid restriction to place on it
Posted By: rillaan (9/14/2010 3:56:01 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Sit him on his throne (the Seat of the Synod, of course) and he'll never die.
Posted By: ClockworkSwordfish (1/25/2011 10:35:54 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I remember when I first started, my friend sported a Mirrodin White-Blue Artifact deck, and his deck's box art featured this guy. I was in such awe when I saw this.

Now, after 6 years and nearly $500 sunk into the game, I can easily say that it is pretty average... at least it's a better drawback than Rusted Sentinel.
Posted By: Ferlord (4/25/2012 2:09:22 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I'm surprised this isn't a Golem or Soldier. I thought Construct was their cop-out creature type.
Posted By: HuntingDrake (5/3/2012 8:37:24 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0