x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 3.761 / 5  (69 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
123 >
Posted By: Superllama12 (9/22/2011 6:25:22 PM)


Awesome art... I really want to try this guy in... idk, SOMETHING... he's cool.
Posted By: Anubisisking (10/1/2011 2:07:24 PM)


My favorite limited rare that I got in my pool. It saved my ass so many times. Haha your puny into the maw means nothing to me! Also he looks pretty horny...(bad pun)
Posted By: alblast (9/26/2011 10:19:02 AM)


Insane card, especially in Limited. Saved me so many times. 5/5
Posted By: SgtSwaggr (9/26/2011 7:14:44 PM)


I think this will become much more relevant after Scars block rotates a year from now and it doesn't have to fear Dismember from every single deck killing it easily.
Posted By: Nagoragama (10/8/2011 5:38:48 PM)


Combos very necely in-set with Blasphemous Act.
Posted By: Lord_of_Tresserhorn (9/23/2011 3:33:47 AM)


Awkward template much?
If "Indestructible" were a keyword that could be used outside of complete sentences, this could read:

Defender, Indestructible
1: Until end of turn, Manor Gargoyle loses defender and indestructible and gains flying.

OK, I take it back. Played this in casual Cube with That Which Was Taken, and the awkward template allowed me to attack with a flying indestructible 4/4.
Posted By: HuntingDrake (10/27/2011 12:26:29 PM)


Great with any wrath effects, and is just a solid card any which way you look at it. A 4/4 indestructible defender for 5 is pretty good, and a 4/4 flyer for 5 is also pretty good. Being able to turn the former into the latter for 1 makes this an excellent card.
Posted By: Asmodi0000 (9/23/2011 8:52:02 AM)


lol plummet
Posted By: Tantudo (9/22/2011 4:02:35 PM)


Indestructible isn't a keyword. It's an ability word. At least, I think that's how it works. Indestructible is not like flying or defender, I know that much. It's about how the rules interact with it that dictate the awkward wording. Indestructible is something you are, not something you have. It's like, being a creature.

Manor Gargoyle is a creature. Manor Gargoyle is indestructible.

You can't say 'Manor Gargoyle loses indestructible' and you can't say 'Manor Gargoyle loses being a creature.'

What they COULD do is make a new keyword to replace the old ability word: Indestructibility. Then you might say 'Manor Gargoyle loses indestructibility.' But that feels like it softens Indestructible. The statement 'X is indestructible' is as powerful, elegant, and imposing as 'Destroy all creatures'.

You try messing around with how they word Wrath of God, and then maybe you can get them to change how they use Indestructible. For basically every other part of Magic except the unfor... (see all)
Posted By: DarthParallax (10/10/2011 9:14:28 PM)


Gatherer works better in the Companion app!