Eh, pretty bad.
If the kicker gave it +1+2 it would be decent, but obviously +1+2 isn't a good counter to have floating around.
So instead I'd have liked to see it be a 4 mana kicker and give three +1+1 counters. That makes it a 4/5 vigilance for 6. In white, that isn't horrible.
Posted By:
Baconradar
(10/5/2011 5:50:23 AM)
My kind of draft card. I don't mind paying 4 for a 2/3 vigilance that could come out two turns earlier if I need it.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(10/17/2011 4:30:36 PM)
2/3 for 4 mana with vigilance, eh? Doesn't sound too great...
Posted By:
Shiduba
(8/22/2009 12:05:20 PM)
I hate pointless little Kicker or Clash cards like this. Though I guess it's a good way to show off a new mechanic...
Posted By:
Weretarrasque
(7/25/2009 9:13:44 AM)
I love the art!
Posted By:
Dischade
(10/16/2009 12:15:29 PM)
I rate it only 1.5, because it's better than Squire and has at least a little late-game worth. But the art is awesome.
Posted By:
Champion_Kitsune
(10/29/2009 9:16:18 PM)
The kicker really is superfluous. A 1/2 with vigilance for {1}{W} is okay, especially in a creature type with decent support like soldiers. It's splashable. However, a 2/3 with vigilance for more than 3 mana just isn't worth it. maybe if the kicker gave it first strike as well...
Posted By:
Ideatog
(11/17/2011 7:10:20 PM)
Kicker cards like this seem pretty useless, but they're pretty good for limited formats.
Posted By:
Lord_Ascapelion
(12/26/2012 8:11:18 PM)
The kicker feels a little expensive but then again it's a common and the kicker is colourless mana so I suppose it was balanced for the time.
I don't like the art for this, it looks more like a red warrior or berserker than white soldier. Something with unleash or haste or rampage or whatever, not vigilance.
Posted By:
velkaarn
(9/15/2013 10:02:37 AM)