x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.581 / 5  (31 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
I wouldn't say it's terrible though.
You have the option to play it unkicked. Compare it to Riftwing Cloudskate, or Ogre Savant. A little better and a little worse than both; Savant has one more toughness but only bounces creatures, and only comes down for 5. Cloudskate has flying and suspend, but only attacks for 2.
Man-o-war is still considered aggressively costed today, considering that they print a functional downgrade of it in recent core sets. It also only returns creatures but being 2 mana cheaper is a big deal in terms of playability.
Posted By: Kryptnyt (11/24/2011 9:27:19 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Not much to say about this creature. 3BlackBlue for a bounce and a 3/1? Unspectacular.
Posted By: Equinox523 (6/7/2011 1:26:20 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


But what about the ART?

A paper-doll non-shaded C-list comic book character blowing Godzilla at you!

Yay Invasion!!!
Posted By: BegleOne (5/11/2013 9:23:09 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Think of all the other black or blue creatures for 3 or 5 that make this card useless. Think about all the other types of control / discard / card advantage that black/blue have for cheap.
Posted By: housebob11 (7/14/2012 9:37:39 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Look, Man-o-war is {2} for a 2/2 with Unsummon. This is just {1}{B} for a 3/1 with Regress, and the option to not kick. It's not terrible.
Posted By: LordRandomness (5/17/2013 5:16:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0