x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 4.398 / 5  (64 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
12 >
This card is AMAZING! It's the Red (and original) Creeping Mold! It's Artifact removal that will never be dead against non-artifact decks!

EDIT: @crimson149: I'm not saying it's the original land destruction spell, because it wasn't. I'm saying it was the first (as far as I can tell) artifact removal spell that wouldn't be dead against non-artifact decks.
Posted By: boneclub (11/21/2010 8:20:45 PM)


For mono red its great. The card is flexible, 3 to destroy a land is excellent in and of itself, and regen prevention on top is suhweet.
Posted By: Sothasil (4/6/2011 4:18:47 AM)


Richard Kane Ferguson art had Kaervek though! And he looked so happy!
Posted By: Kryptnyt (12/21/2010 5:25:56 AM)


"Actually, sinkhole is the original."

Stone Rain and Ice Storm were also printed in Alpha. You can't say one came before the other.
Posted By: scumbling1 (3/30/2011 7:59:56 AM)


Much worse art. No flavor text. :(

It's possible, nay, even likely that they would have had to pay RKF extra money to reprint his art in PDS:FaL, whereas the 7E art was paid for in a single sum and could be re-used indefinitely then.
Posted By: Lord_of_Tresserhorn (3/18/2012 8:59:26 AM)


Not strictly better than Demolish, since it is considerably less splashable.

Also, why would they put the lame-ass 7th ed. artwork in the Premium deck? Richard Kane Ferguson's art was phenomenal on everything, and this was one of his best.
Posted By: Atali (2/6/2011 9:25:34 PM)


Ahh much better art. Super useful now that artifacts are prevalent again.
Posted By: Richard_Hawk (12/7/2010 11:49:18 PM)


Strictly better than Demolish, making it good enough for me. Red Rain of Tears that cans regeneration on manlands and can also bury artifacts. Very nice all around.
Posted By: Detonativity (11/20/2010 3:43:51 PM)


the RKF version has much better art.
Posted By: Anathame (8/28/2011 1:38:05 AM)


I believe the reason this art was changed in 7th edition was because the original RKF art shows a barbarian that takes up almost the whole picture, looking like a creature card. This art has a guy blowing stuff up, the explosion being the central point. It actually looks like a sorcery.
Posted By: Naftal (11/19/2012 8:02:27 PM)