x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.288 / 5  (33 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12 >
Funny how this is identical to Rakdos's Return when x=2 and the majority of the time you use Rakdos's Return it is with x=2. All this lacks is the ability to be an overcosted Red Sun's Zenith and burn people as a finisher.
Posted By: ThePhoenixOfDoom (10/29/2012 5:54:59 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


To everyone saying this should have been printed at {1}{B}{B}:
Just compare this to Blightning. Blightning is two colors and was still a very powerful card. Reducing the amount of life loss by one would not be enough to justify taking an amazing multicolored card and making it monocolored. Now, a cost of {B}{B}{B} would be fair (as it would restrict this to mono-black decks). Of course, Wizards probably doesn't like printing many cards with such restrictive costs.
Posted By: marmaris74 (5/1/2012 5:09:58 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I notice that Greg Staples did the art for both this and the AVR edition of Angel's Mercy. The similar poses can't be coincidence...But I do wonder if the mirroring was part of the art directions.
Posted By: SkyknightXi (4/27/2012 10:21:07 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It's like reversed Sign in Blood.
Posted By: Autor (5/3/2012 10:15:20 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Angel's Mercy!?
Posted By: Kryptnyt (4/27/2012 12:28:27 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This is what happened to the guy a the bar who was playing wingman to his buddy who wanted to pick up the chick in Angel's Mercy.
Posted By: Paleopaladin (4/30/2012 10:49:45 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


She's actually headbutting the dude.
Posted By: Cyberium (4/27/2012 12:38:37 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It's always interesting to see cards like this that are terrible but if their mana cost had been tweaked just a tad, they could have seen actual play. As mentioned, 1BB would have been good, but you just can't justify the additional mana for this.
Posted By: Eternal_Blue (4/29/2012 2:24:17 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I think they are both dudes... though vampire make-up makes it tough to tell, sometimes.
Posted By: ZEvilMustache (4/28/2012 11:04:30 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Blightning!?
Posted By: lorendorky (4/26/2012 10:56:43 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0