This is why Ib is in charge.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(12/5/2010 12:44:02 PM)
Casting cost may be a bit high, but banding with this guy isn't so bad.
Posted By:
nammertime
(12/30/2009 9:36:41 AM)
Think of it as a 4 cast 0 equip +0/+4 card that lets you ignore an amount of damage equal to your toughness.
Posted By:
FragNutMK1
(2/18/2010 9:05:04 AM)
Way better than it's current rating indicates. The casting cost is a touch too high, but the banding ability on a defender is solid.
This guy can be very annoying to get past.
3/5
Posted By:
Gaussgoat
(2/23/2010 10:59:56 AM)
Your opponent attacks with a 3/4. You block it with four Kjeldoran Warriors and Wall of Shields. Assign all combat damage to the wall. Your guys live and the 3/4 dies.
Granted by the time you've got all that out he's gonna have more than a 3/4, but the banding will wear him down if he's simply attacking you.
Posted By:
Wraique
(2/23/2010 8:48:46 PM)
I always wanted to like this card, but it just isn't that strong. Banding on a creature with toughness 4 is pretty useful, but it would have been much more playable if it had 1 power (or 5 toughness) or if the casting cost had been 2.
Posted By:
Mulmaster
(3/19/2010 4:34:51 AM)
No one commented on the flavor text yet? It's hilarious! (Like most goblin flavor texts)
Posted By:
divine_exodus
(10/10/2010 5:07:05 AM)
Steel Wall is better.
Posted By:
Duskdale_Wurm
(6/6/2010 12:31:15 AM)
Helps stronger guys block & not die...just band them & make like the original kor: distribute damage how you see fit.
Posted By:
MattLynn
(5/8/2013 9:36:38 AM)