there is a reason why Edge of Autumn is better than Rampant Growth in this deck.
Knight of the Reliquary is the reason. That cycling ability helps more than you think. not only would you get a card, but it would act as a pump for your knight. Then again, Harrow would work in this deck just as well, too, without the 4 or less restriction.
Posted By:
Pigfish99
(6/5/2011 10:48:50 AM)
This card is core-set worthy, if only Cycling were considered "evergreen."
Posted By:
DacenOctavio
(8/16/2011 11:00:07 AM)
Like Swirling Sandstorm without Threshold, this spell does absolutely nothing if you cast it with five or more lands in your control.
Posted By:
Gabriel422
(11/17/2011 4:13:20 AM)
There are decks that just need X amount of lands. For those decks, this card is great. Rampant growth for comparison will be a dead draw late in the game whereas this isn't. And let's be honest: who wants to rampant growth for that ninth land?
Posted By:
Shiizu
(12/29/2011 3:44:58 PM)
This is custom-made for Domain decks.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(3/8/2012 8:18:02 PM)
Is it worse than Rampant growth? In a weenie deck I'm not so sure...
Posted By:
ffang
(4/7/2011 9:41:43 AM)
No they should reprint them and you should respect the awesome Future Sight set and Time Spiral Block
Posted By:
ICEFANG13
(4/6/2011 12:13:50 AM)
*Sigh* It just doesn't look the same without the Future Sight border.
Am I seriously the only person who likes those borders? All I hear is hate on them, and I think they're really cool looking.
Posted By:
DoragonShinzui
(3/15/2012 5:36:50 AM)
they should reframe more of those ugly FS cards
Posted By:
DellamorteDellamore0
(4/4/2011 10:47:14 PM)
"Free" card draw is always nice, especially in green, which usually has overpriced draw.
3/5 Stars
Posted By:
Hunter06
(2/17/2013 6:51:08 PM)