x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 1.951 / 5  (51 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
Serpents suck. It's the norm.
Posted By: JoeVector (3/5/2010 2:47:27 PM)


Serpents < Wurms.
Posted By: DacenOctavio (8/22/2011 11:00:44 PM)


Totally unplayable at SEVEN mana with a so strong blue requirement.
Assuming they wanted or needed to make it playable only in blue, they could cost it BlueBlueBlueBlueBlue or 1BlueBlueBlueBlue to leave it at 5 mana; or 3BlueBlueBlue for 6 mana. At 7 it is really overcosted.
Posted By: Paolino (2/27/2012 5:13:56 AM)


Double its P/T, and it would be good.
Posted By: Totema (5/22/2012 6:18:00 PM)


Protip: Shrouded Serpent doesn't have shroud.
Posted By: Test-Subject_217601 (8/28/2010 8:26:02 PM)


I agree with SavageBrain, im mean what the heck is wrong with that card? A plain 4/4 unblockable creature would still be rather awful with a converted mana cost of seven, but on top of it it's even triple-blue costed, plus it has a drawback that lets the opponent even block the card if he wants to afford the mana!
I have no idea why this was made a rare card, wouldn't have been ground-braking as uncommon in draft either.

Just pay 1 more and get Tidal Kraken, which is 50% stronger and can't be screwed when attacking.
Or if you're looking for a more playable unblockable 4/4 body, use Ghastlord of Fugue instead.
Posted By: Mode (8/24/2009 5:12:21 AM)


Many travelers have wandered into a fog only to pay 4 and emerge unharmed.
Posted By: metalevolence (12/11/2010 6:06:20 PM)


So if the opponent doesn't have untapped lands and has instants in hand (which is highly unlikely by turn eight) then its a 4/4 unblockable . . . that costs seven mana. Was this created as a joke or something?
Posted By: SavageBrain89 (6/24/2009 7:48:43 PM)


Rhystic Serpent?
Posted By: Continue (4/1/2013 11:04:38 AM)