Very well designed. It is in color (First strike={R} Trample={G} Lifelink={W}), playable, and perfectly costed. If this wasn't {RRGGGWW} then it would be overpowered.
And by the way, "multiple instances of the same comment about the redundancy of the rulings are redundant".
Posted By:
shotoku64
(12/13/2011 12:56:29 PM)
THUNDER CATS, HO!!!!!!!
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(9/6/2011 9:20:53 PM)
From the rulings: "Multiple instances of the same ruling are redundant."
Posted By:
Condor_96
(10/14/2011 11:21:36 PM)
And by the way, "multiple instances of the same comment about the redundancy of the rulings are redundant".
My head hurts.
Posted By:
theVillageIdiot
(1/11/2012 4:39:18 PM)
No, from the rulings:
10/1/2008: Multiple instances of first strike and trample are redundant.
10/1/2009: Multiple instances of first strike and trample are redundant.
BAHAHAHA
Posted By:
Shadoflaam
(10/16/2011 8:46:11 AM)
Take a moment to look at the rulings. Go ahead, I'll wait for you.
Seems a little redundant, right?
Anyway, this card makes me want to squeal like a little girl.
Posted By:
BastianQoU
(9/11/2011 12:25:52 PM)
It's not a bad card, but when you consider Overrun and Overwhelming Stampede (5 mana), and Garruk Wildspeaker (4 mana), 7 mana for the Overrun style effect just seems like a big investment for something that actually does nothing if you have no creatures out.
Posted By:
JaxsonBateman
(3/8/2012 11:20:20 PM)
It's just not overpowered enough without vigilance, flying, intimidate, reach, shadow, bushido, ninjutsu, double strike, deathtouch, horsemanship, banding, protection, haste, and modular.
Posted By:
001010011100101110
(11/18/2011 1:20:02 PM)
@people commenting on the rulings: "We apologize for the fault in the rulings. Those responsible have been sacked." "We apologize again for the fault in the rulings. Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked, have been sacked."
Posted By:
gman92
(3/13/2012 12:21:20 PM)