x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.848 / 5  (46 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12 >
I may actually see the day where I can build a successful tribal griffon deck. Well, mostly tribal.
Posted By: RagingGoblinGrenade (9/26/2012 3:56:21 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@Firesplitter, If you wouldn't consider playing this in your Limited deck, then you need to stay very far away from Limited. Either that, or come at the store I play at, so I can have an easy opponent to beat.
2/3 fliers for 3 are generally quite decent, if not better. 3 toughness resists a good amount of damage sources and 2 evasive power beats down well enough. It doesn't look like it'll be as good in this limited as it was in Innistrad (where this guy was called Chapel Geist) but he's fine nonetheless. He won't win you the game on his own but he'll be s solid team member.
Posted By: Magnor_Criol (9/28/2012 12:23:39 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Griffins are getting slightly better in every block. By linear regression, in approximately seven years they will be outclassing the titans.
Posted By: Totema (9/28/2012 11:08:21 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Finally, another Griffin you can get out before turn 4 that isn't a bag of crap. This'll join Diving Griffin and Azorius First-Wing as a card to round out the awful mana curve most Griffin decks struggle with.
Posted By: yyukichigai (9/28/2012 7:50:22 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Decent low costing griifin slowly adds to the decent list of griffin and griffin related cards... maybe we are being seeded for the griffin/pegasus/salamander block.
Posted By: lorendorky (9/25/2012 10:25:04 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This would be better with Deathtouch and Lifelink. But you know, that would kind of turn it into a game breaking mistake of a card...
Posted By: SirWhetcastleKibbs (9/29/2012 1:49:40 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


2/3 flier for 3 isn't BAD, guys. It's just...underwhelming.

It's a common. Deal with it.
Posted By: DoragonShinzui (9/27/2012 4:09:14 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Pros like me know how good fliers can be in the right deck. Especially, low-costed commons like this one.
Posted By: Lotsofpoopy (9/27/2012 8:59:58 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Why Wizards??? WHYYYY must you make every griffin so mediocre?! Pretty sweet art on this one though.
Posted By: 1337vanguard (9/27/2012 8:22:51 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I would consider this if I only had 8 creatures in my limited deck.. Otherwise, no.
Posted By: Firesplitter. (9/26/2012 2:21:15 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0