x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 2.114 / 5  (44 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
12 >
On the plus side, it looks like the Simic are up to their old tricks again...
Posted By: Trygon_Predator (9/26/2012 1:23:09 PM)


I don't care that you're not that great of a card, little buddy! Your name is so cute and whenever I used your ability, I have to add a "num num num num" sound effect to it.
This card wasn't made to be great, he was made for lovin'.
Posted By: GruesomeGoo (10/1/2012 12:16:10 PM)


Combine the effect with Slitherhead. You get 2 counters per sac. Can be quite devastating. Heck any low cost scavenge card is feasible in that logic.
Posted By: ninjaboy05 (9/28/2012 10:37:40 PM)


Underwhelming, which is too bad given the fun flavor this card has.
Posted By: Radagast (10/5/2012 6:12:20 PM)



Yeah, Scarland Thrinax and I aren't impressed.
Posted By: DoragonShinzui (9/26/2012 8:35:45 PM)


I don't see how this relates to turkeys...
Posted By: Demento_Recraves (9/26/2012 5:08:23 PM)


This is a good ooze that pros like me will be using to combo with scavenge effects.
Posted By: Lotsofpoopy (9/26/2012 9:05:12 PM)


sigh, give it Golgari flavor, you know the guild that this actually fits with in this expansion? More oozes is sweet though.
Posted By: lorendorky (9/25/2012 11:52:37 PM)


Sadly, it blows.
A 3/3 for five mana is bad.
A 4/4 for a total of six mana and a sacrificed creature is bad.
A 5/5 for a total of seven mana and two sacrificed creatures is bad.
And so on...

Yes yes, in a token deck this can grown. But it just costs too much mana and lacks any useful keyword abilities, such as trample or regeneration or whatever.
Posted By: majinara (9/27/2012 12:33:20 AM)


It's missing the Simic Watermark. Blech.
Posted By: RAV0004 (9/30/2012 1:50:30 PM)