x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.713 / 5  (47 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12 >
Lurking Crocodile is better!
Posted By: tcollins (7/10/2011 12:33:45 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Traditional color hate at rare, part 1. See also Pygmy Allosaurus.
Posted By: Lord_of_Tresserhorn (3/9/2012 8:09:35 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Dies to Narwhal, cause they are so awesome.
Posted By: ryrlb (1/4/2013 4:11:02 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


then it would have been too "zoo" -like. I just too play these in casual 5 color decks all the time. zoo its whats for breakfast....I hope they don't come down too zealously on creatures that remind us of real world animals...these cards give us some bearings to measure all other creatures. Runeclaw bear is hammy and over the top looking.
Posted By: OutlawD1 (8/30/2009 1:47:45 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Shouldn't be polar bears: they're not in the poles. They're on a nearly equatorial continent (what with the ice age and all).
Posted By: longwinded (7/11/2010 5:32:25 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


First the Sabertooth Tiger, now polar bears.

Lovisa's parenting skills make environmentalists cry themselves to sleep at night.
Posted By: Grumman (12/3/2012 9:26:08 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@jbrsci1: Back in the day, creatures lacked the ability to landwalk on anything but the land of their color. This was considered rare because it could go unblockable against green's traditional enemy: blue. Of course, this was largely negated by Counterspell, Power Sink and a bunch of other cards.
Posted By: Equinox523 (5/13/2011 10:52:22 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Green islandwalkers rock.
Posted By: FragNutMK1 (2/18/2010 11:29:56 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


WHY IS THIS A RARE? WHY IS THIS ANYTHING BUT COMMON?
Posted By: jbrsci1 (4/8/2011 10:11:16 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Shouldn't it be named Polar Bears?
Posted By: SavageBrain89 (6/25/2009 5:24:51 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0