This is exactly the reason I dont play competitive magic. Well cards like this. Just beyond broken for the sake of the mythic tag, without much thought behind it. She is strong so bust out wallet and run x3-x4, or whatever the netdeck tells you to do. Hur dur.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(5/1/2014 10:03:28 PM)
Creatures with exalted you control have exalted, exalted, exalted, exalted, and exalted.
Exalted.
Posted By:
Salient
(7/17/2012 10:37:10 PM)
Combos with creatures.
Posted By:
mikeymillz
(7/6/2012 12:54:04 PM)
I love this card. But I don't understand why it needed to be 4 CMC instead of 5 or even 6. I'd still consider it Mythic, since that's a potentially huge bonus to one creature, and because exalted stacks. I still want it in my deck, but I'm not going to argue with anyone who thinks it's overpowered, because it is.
Posted By:
sarroth
(7/6/2012 10:51:29 AM)
Insane art insane Angel. 4.5/5.
Orangey!!!
Posted By:
Silence9
(7/28/2012 12:43:10 PM)
This is just rude. Also, surprised at the lack of "yo, dawg" comments.
Posted By:
blindthrall
(7/22/2012 5:59:08 PM)
I'd like it better if it wasn't, you know, $25.
Posted By:
rollinsclone
(8/17/2012 10:04:33 AM)
Infinite reflection just got broken...
Posted By:
robinjohnson
(7/15/2012 2:28:24 PM)
@Eluem: Rarity has never been about complexity. The rarity schedule is a pretty deep blend of considerations including power level of the card, frequency they want it appearing in Limited, board and game impact, iconic feel, as well as complexity and I'm sure other points I'm unaware of. (I think "money potential" is far less of a concern than most people think to R&D, though I'm also sure it's not ignored.)
Posted By:
Magnor_Criol
(7/20/2012 7:45:38 PM)
I don't enjoy the power level of this card, but cannot deny the power appeal.
Posted By:
Cyberium
(7/6/2012 8:55:27 PM)