One question needs to be asked: When you unleash this guy, is he "off the chain" or "on the chain"?
Posted By:
yesnomu
(11/20/2012 11:07:27 PM)
I think this is SO much better than Mogg Flunkies despite having less toughness.
Posted By:
lorendorky
(9/25/2012 11:29:17 PM)
This looks like it'd be pretty nice in draft. A 3/2 for 2 is nothing to sneeze at.
Posted By:
SyntheticDreamer
(9/25/2012 8:17:13 PM)
Strong Limited card, and I love the feel to it. Brings you a nice look into how sick the Rakdos carnival really is.
Posted By:
GruesomeGoo
(10/1/2012 11:55:56 AM)
This card is so very under-costed. There was a time, not so long ago, when a red 3/2 for 2 would require you to sacrifice 3 permanents and pay a cumulative upkeep of 5 blue mana.
Posted By:
systsoultaker
(11/5/2012 7:57:16 PM)
Look at the high-res art.
http://media.wizards.com/images/magic/daily/ur/ur217_gorehouse_chainwalker.jpg
He's holding a fork in his hand...
Posted By:
zzxyyzx
(6/16/2013 9:55:47 PM)
I like this card, the flavor and art really show what Rakdos is about. And a 3/2 that can't block for 2 is not to shabby for a common.
Posted By:
ravenclaw567
(9/25/2012 4:44:13 PM)
This is darn solid in draft. A 3/2 with a drawback is a big threat.
It can also be a chump in the late game. What a lovely design.
Posted By:
RJDroid
(9/30/2012 7:25:02 PM)
Like Splatter Thug, Grim Roustabout and Hellhole Flailer, his Unleash works rather well with Bramblewood Paragon in a warrior deck, since he can get trample from her even if you cast him at first.
Ash Zealot is probably the better choice for a red two-drop though,
given that you don't have problems with casting her 
cost.
Posted By:
Mode
(10/3/2012 1:58:45 PM)
Man, a lot of these unleash creatures sure seem like pretty fun draft choices. Not blocking's not a problem if you're already smashed your opponent's face in.
Posted By:
SirMalkin
(9/25/2012 10:45:16 PM)