Green gets the cost-efficient vanilla creatures.
Posted By:
Trygon_Predator
(7/5/2012 4:38:37 PM)
...Look down, now back up
I'm a horse
Posted By:
ToAsTy42o
(10/5/2012 3:29:30 PM)
Fine in limited, I suppose.
Posted By:
Edio
(7/6/2012 2:30:57 PM)
Chub Toad is a sad toad.
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(8/21/2012 8:24:06 AM)
@Lash_of_Dragonbreath
&
@marmaris74
Now I'm really curious what Ferlord apparently said as it seems he deleted that post...
Edit: @marmaris74 Ah, thanks, much appreciated.
Posted By:
DritzD27
(8/24/2012 6:15:49 PM)
Great art, great flavor text, and nothing wrong with 
for a 3/3. Solid card overall. If Canyon Minotaur was costed the same, we'd see some fun fun minotaur v. centaur battles. Oh the flavor, the artifact equipment skirmishes. Alas, it is not to be.
Posted By:
Morgaledh
(9/7/2012 9:31:31 PM)
I am givving this guy 5/5 just becuase he (and many other vanilla) creature plays an essential role in giving creature-to-manacost ratio a standard. They are the epitome of what new players need to learn the game. Simple, clean, easy, and impactful on limited. Giving him a low rating would be unfair and disregarding his and his friend's contribution to Magic: the Gathering.
Posted By:
3045
(8/27/2012 7:35:17 PM)
@Ferlord: Primalcrux is disappointed.
And it's funny no one mentioned Nessian Courser yet.
Posted By:
Lash_of_Dragonbreath
(7/15/2012 9:26:02 PM)
@Ferlord
So, I'm guessing I'm the only one who built an Elephant Graveyard deck.
Edit:
@DritzD27
I don't remember exactly what Ferlord said, but it had something to do with this card being strictly better than Trained Armodon. Hence my joke.
Posted By:
marmaris74
(8/6/2012 12:14:59 PM)
This chick is probably the best vanilla creature in the set. I am a pro and would consider using this card for standard just to prove a point that pros can win with vanilla creatures.
Posted By:
Lotsofpoopy
(9/2/2012 1:48:54 AM)