The wall has a fetus in it. If you destroy it, you will abort that fetus, can you morally kill this wall?
Posted By:
FragNutMK1
(3/22/2010 5:54:07 AM)
It's an artifact because it was based on something only known in D&D beforehand, which, as it turns out, was some monstrous creation, unnatural, probably created by a wizard. The art depicts pieces of people and monsters used to create the wall.
Posted By:
nammertime
(12/27/2009 5:25:34 PM)
This card makes a lot of sense. It should be reprinted
Posted By:
ion1000
(5/12/2010 5:45:14 AM)
This is a decent wall, but why is this an artifact, and what is the art depicting???
Posted By:
Guest57443454
(7/1/2009 4:18:06 PM)
it's alive
Posted By:
ttian
(3/25/2009 2:40:29 AM)
regeneration seems kinda redundent on 6 toughness, but it's still cool
Posted By:
bijart_dauth
(2/18/2011 7:35:35 PM)
Truly grotesque art, but makes a lot of sense. This is actually still not a bad wall, especially considering that -toughness kill spells such as Dismember, which are one of the most common forms of regeneration-hosing out there, cannot kill it alone at a hefty 6 toughness. As a colorless artifact, it can be played in any deck that needs some defense, and at 
its cost is not too prohibitive in slower formats. This would be a very fair card in limited, because though it can block all day, it will not straight win you games, and without flying it would not solve problems with evasive creatures. It would certainly be cool to see this old card reprinted in the future.
Posted By:
Equinox523
(1/2/2014 9:15:49 AM)
It only takes 6 Scars to kill it!
2/5 Stars
Posted By:
Hunter06
(5/16/2014 7:38:26 AM)