Would it have been too powerful if it destroyed target artifact or enchantment at that madness cost? Or if it just destroyed target enchantment but had a madness cost of 0?
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(9/19/2010 9:52:30 PM)
Try Aura of Silence.
Posted By:
mrredhatter
(10/26/2009 12:38:36 PM)
Bog Witch. This. Use the three mana to play that Haakon, Stromgald Scourge you dredged using Stinkweed Imp. Card advantage is better than a Demystify, if the situation arises.
Nothing I know of is "strictly better" than this. If you can find a way to pay a cost by discarding a card and then PLAYING that card in your deck, this card has some uses.
Posted By:
Kelther
(5/11/2013 10:30:28 AM)
It's a Demystify for its madness cost. And you're right. It's still bad.
Posted By:
Lateralis0ne
(5/24/2010 4:32:28 PM)
Bad even for its madness cost.
Posted By:
AlphaNumerical
(8/11/2009 11:21:00 PM)
DUMBLEDORE!
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(12/19/2011 1:59:23 AM)
I see this working well with spirit cairn or some other discard card
Posted By:
Cloudchaser.Kestrel
(1/14/2012 3:48:22 PM)
Strictly worse than Erase. (the urza's legacy one)
Posted By:
HellkatOverlord
(9/27/2012 7:59:19 PM)
Guess I'm the only one so far that liked the flavor text enough to say it, huh? Any whoo.. Pretty awesome :)
Posted By:
Mike-C
(4/13/2013 6:33:09 PM)
Madness cards cannot be so easily compared to their non-Madness counterparts. I would like to introduce everyone to three things: Card Advantage, alternative casting costs and "Discard a card from your hand:". (Note the colon, free abilities are great.)
I would call this and Fiery Temper better than Demystify and Lightning Bolt, but I also would build synergistic decks that have a real focus when using the former. If a non-Melvin built a deck, he'd prefer the latter, and the latter would probably work better for him.
Regarding the card: it sucks. But I'll take what I can get. White only has two Madness cards.
Posted By:
MacBizzle
(3/31/2014 12:15:21 PM)