x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 3.908 / 5  (38 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
12 >
no. if they are not on the battlefield they are "creature cards" not "creatures".
Posted By: garabor (1/13/2012 3:05:25 AM)


I didn't care bout this guy till someone said he can get rid of Progenitus, awesome!
Posted By: mrredhatter (10/3/2009 12:30:45 PM)



Unless otherwise specified, you can only affect cards in play, so black creature cards on the battlefield would be exiled, for example, but it's not like you could search his library and take out all of his black cards.

So it's Wrath Of God on a stick. Not bad. 2/3 flying for 4 isn't great, but the fact that he's got a very, very specific Wrath is interesting.

I wouldn't play him, but I can see where they were going with this. IIRC, Torment had a very color-heavy theme, with lots of hate both ways.
Posted By: Jannissary (2/7/2012 2:16:45 PM)



You could play Darkest Hour and stop complaining about this not being a Final Judgment...
Posted By: Ferlord (12/27/2012 10:29:18 AM)


What the other people aren't realizing is that you don't have to pay 9 mana all at once. you can pay it separately. Just because he has an expensive ability doesn't mean you have to play it ASAP. You could use it as a threat, instead.

And when you feel your opponent is getting too much, then you can activate this card. Besides, 2/3 isn't that bad of a creature, all things considered. sure, its a bit under for 4 mana, but you can do worse.
Posted By: Pigfish99 (7/10/2011 8:19:37 AM)


This guy just seems racist.
Posted By: TheFrostReaper (5/1/2009 7:12:27 PM)


You people fail to realize that Wrath can't attack or block, then be activated in response to it's own blocking, causing the creature to remain blocked AND all black creatures to be exiled.
Posted By: Test-Subject_217601 (10/5/2010 8:41:02 AM)


"Son of a bîtch"

-Black Players
Posted By: Goatllama (1/1/2012 3:50:02 PM)


you know, any old wrath gets rid of progenitus. and those are nice in that they're playable.
Posted By: metalevolence (4/14/2011 9:59:51 PM)


This is something I do not think anyone has even mentioned about this card here. I am looking for a ruling on this card because it says Remove ALL black creatures from the game. It does not specify from where!!! So can this remove all creatures from deck graveyard and in play from game? or is it just from play?

If this is the case than this creature is far more powerful than most people here seem to think. It does not state from where creatures are removed just simply states remove them from the game! There is no indicator to direct it to creatures in play or anywhere else for that matter.
Posted By: Dragonlord-D (8/10/2011 3:11:20 PM)