Of all the Vores, this one is the ugly cousin.
2.5/5
Posted By:
Cigarette
(2/2/2010 9:13:22 AM)
You can't bet on your opponent running enchantments or enchantment destruction so this guy really needs to have a deck built around him (with auratog in it I guess). Given the circumstance it may just have been viable to cost this guy at 1W or even W as flashy build-around card. Either that or he needs to be way bigger (flying, power = to twice the number of enchantments in graveyards, tha kind of thing). The least they could do is give him a way to find enchantments from your deck or sac them for some effect. I mean throw us a bone here, nobody's going to build the whole combo around this guy, he needs to get the ball rolling himself.
Posted By:
TPmanW
(2/19/2011 1:40:04 AM)
@Clockworkswordfish
It doesn't help that you didnt spell Lhurgoyf right, either
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(4/17/2011 7:39:30 PM)
Bad implementation of a good idea.
Posted By:
mrredhatter
(10/2/2009 3:05:16 PM)
That thing looks awesome, but grows rather slowly compared to other Llurgoyfs. Of course spellcheck doesn't recognize llurgoyf.
Edit: @Kryptnyt: It still doesn't.
Posted By:
ClockworkSwordfish
(4/21/2011 10:36:19 AM)
It could have actually been a good card...
Except enchantments are pretty bad...
Too bad this couldnt have been a rare for that totem power intro pack, lol.
Posted By:
Anubisisking
(1/29/2011 7:40:14 PM)
Love the art, too bad there are better Llurgoyfs out there.
Posted By:
tcollins
(11/23/2010 2:41:50 PM)
Would this really have been broken at either WW or 2W? :/
Posted By:
dingophone
(11/18/2011 11:22:06 PM)
I want to like him. He's not terrible, really, it's just that there's no deck that needs him. And of course, he's overshadowed by all of his much more powerful brothers.
Posted By:
ScissorsLizard
(11/30/2011 1:49:14 AM)