It seems like a bad idea to design a deck whose sole intention is to make one creature big. Frankly, whenever your entire combo can be dismantled by a commonly used card like Path to Exile (which could be cast by your opponent even if you get this out by, say, turn 2), then what you have is a bad combo. I'm not invoking the "dies to removal" argument, because it's okay that a creature can die to removal as long as you can replace it with another creature. But if the entire purpose of your deck is to build up this one guy, I think that's a bad move.
Posted By:
GoblinNaysayer93
(6/12/2011 8:33:17 PM)
traumatize yourself, then this, then evil laughter
Posted By:
Sironos
(9/13/2010 3:54:07 PM)
once I played it in a deck, drew him late game and he came in as a 64/57
Posted By:
Wormfang
(11/21/2010 12:51:45 PM)
Void Maw in the graveyard.
Necrotic Ooze and Experiment Kaji on the field
Quicksilver elemental
use these to some how get void maws ability on this guy and boom!
Posted By:
XaiviarNightwing
(4/6/2013 6:33:19 AM)
I never figured out how to abuse this card. I'm getting bored with my decks I have now, maybe I'll try it.
Posted By:
car2n
(2/20/2014 4:44:42 AM)
Purposefully letting Phyrexian Dreadnaught die, before feeding it to this guy makes for a very cheap and ugly affair. This is an interesting take on the oldschool Frankenstein's Monster, though cleaned up nicely and much more powerful.
Posted By:
Equinox523
(4/15/2014 7:45:39 AM)