x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.743 / 5  (35 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
At least 4/5 just for the name. It actually isn't that bad if you enjoy your hellbent-esque things or dredge. Suspend stuff you need or w/e. Memory Jar or Wheel of Fortune effects are your friends
Posted By: axiobeta (9/7/2011 5:13:12 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Oh man, I remember playing this way back in my Burning Bridges Deck.
Posted By: zk3 (9/9/2009 2:57:28 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


As cheap as board clearing cards get. The cost is pretty heavy but, Wham! all of your board presence building is undone and I can reset the clock to turn one or two where my red deck has the advantage.
Posted By: TPmanW (1/12/2011 7:38:44 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Simple, get 1 or 2 creatures with 2+ power and protection from red, drop this very eary, and bang ez win. Could also throw Blasphemous Act into that deck as a filler when you dont draw this.
Posted By: TheWrathofShane (3/5/2012 2:13:07 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I see Fireball decided it didn't need Channel anymore...>.>

I can't think of any support cards you'd really need for this. Well, except maybe, if you wanted to go overboard...Necropotence.
Posted By: DarthParallax (5/29/2012 12:12:30 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Shouldn't it be "discard any number of cards at random. Each player sacrifices lands equal to the number of cards discarded this way and ~ deals damage to each creature equal to the number of cards discarded this way."?
Posted By: ffang (3/31/2011 2:32:04 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Werebear and Terravore both love it when this is played with X = 3.
Posted By: MrMilosz (3/16/2013 5:06:25 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Apocalypse on a budget
Posted By: LordRandomness (5/26/2013 4:59:27 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This card is surprisingly poor. The random discard and sorcery speed (meaning you can't cast it in response to another spell of yours) make it really really hard to exploit. And hat's not to mention that you're just totally destroyed by counterspells. The pre-emptive random discard makes it basically impossible to even counter-back.

Someone said that you reset the game to where your red deck has an advantage...the problem is that when you do that you also don't have a hand left.
Posted By: EGarrett01 (12/16/2013 2:53:43 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Best in Life from the Loam decks. Basically all you're doing is throwing garbage in the bin (free lands) and then some more lands; which if you were playing any other portion of the deck; should be fine. You just want to set the opponent back to square one again while you have a Planeswalker ticking up or something. This should actually be remarkably good next to Tibalt since your opponent will get stuck with a boatload of cards in hand while he ticks up.

Works well also because you're probably going full-bore on Wasteland; so this can eat the basics that are left over.
Posted By: blurrymadness (4/11/2014 2:33:02 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0