Strictly more flavorful than Priests of Norn
Posted By:
Nagoragama
(6/19/2011 10:44:50 PM)
I think you guys misunderstand what "strictly better" means...it means the card is without a doubt 100% better in any situation. As a counterexample, If your opponent has no creatures and is at 1 life with no poison counters, I'd much rather have Femeref Scouts in play. Conversely, if I had an opponent with 20 life and 9 poison counters, I'd rather have Priests of Norn in play. An example of a strictly better card is how many would argue (in terms of power of cards) Demonic Tutor is strictly better than Diabolic Tutor since they have the exact same effect, except Demonic costs {1}{B} less.
Posted By:
tcollins
(5/4/2012 2:21:30 AM)
Strictly completely different than Inferno Titan.
Posted By:
BongRipper420
(10/19/2012 5:49:00 PM)
Strictly worse than Priests of Norn
Posted By:
Shadoflaam
(5/25/2011 6:19:48 PM)
i doubt that they are from femere
Posted By:
DaaNz
(3/14/2009 8:41:56 AM)
@Tcollins.
Yeah, but demonic tutor can be spell snare, but diabolic tutor cannot. So in that one case, diabolic is better. I think no card is strictly better by the literal definition, because you could always provide one card to change that.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(1/19/2013 4:15:44 AM)
Actually this card played an important role on Mirage Limited since it could stop most of the common creatures (2/2 flankers or four cost 3/3s).
Posted By:
madm3001
(4/23/2013 2:58:28 PM)