Yea, considering you need 5 mana to pull off the combo with Rancor, and even then it only works on creatures, it's worth paying 1 more for Desert Twister, which can destroy anything including planeswalkers. Or use Brittle Effigy for much more reliable removal.
Posted By:
achilleselbow
(8/3/2010 1:05:44 AM)
It's actually not that bad... especially if you're playing mono-green, this could be pretty nice addition to your deck :) Sure, umbras somewhat limit it's potential, but it's still not so bad... but it lacks flexibility of Naturalize or efficiency of Back to Nature
Posted By:
Narim
(12/12/2010 9:18:14 AM)
You should definitely play this with Rancor or some other recurring aura to avoid a blank card in hand.
Posted By:
holgir
(8/6/2009 2:25:28 AM)
too bad it's a sorcery.. i'd stick with desert twister since it's only one card out of my hand and doesn't need a combo to make it work... wouldn't want to risk my Rancor remaining on someone's creature just b/c i tried to pull this off...
Posted By:
ubii
(7/5/2010 10:03:57 PM)
this card is a little expensive but the fact that it destroys an enchanted permanent, means it could destroy either a land or creature, and upon destroying that, the enchantment goes with it.
Posted By:
Guest2146443305
(6/26/2009 10:16:34 PM)
In other words, you get rid of an Aura and the permanent it's attached to. Doesn't sound bad actually.
Posted By:
Mode
(9/26/2009 10:47:16 AM)
Alternately, use Bequeathal to avoid card disadvantage.
Posted By:
chards
(12/30/2011 11:19:01 AM)