Art is just weird and awkward. Card is good; quick and efficient, just like the Boros. Probably help you gather a third turn battalion as well.
Posted By:
pedrodyl
(1/27/2013 10:06:24 AM)
But you can see her Boros armor!
Posted By:
Totema
(1/22/2013 8:49:20 PM)
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought it was absurd how close her crotch is to the front of the frame.
Posted By:
K34
(1/7/2014 2:53:23 PM)
An absolute stalwart of limited.
Posted By:
James_Kernaghan
(1/27/2013 4:14:21 AM)
Extreme art reprint failure.
Posted By:
LordOfTheFlies87
(1/23/2013 10:11:10 AM)
I ordered 4 old copies on instant.
Posted By:
TexasDice
(3/25/2013 1:01:13 AM)
The art alone is fine I guess, however it does not belong on this card. Its only made worse by the fact that this is one of the better Boros commons so this is going to see tons of limited play.
Posted By:
.Blaze.
(1/24/2013 6:31:44 PM)
A good card ruined by absolutely horrible art. I have no idea why this was ever okayed (probably by the same people who okayed Merfolk of the Depths), but trying to defend fantasy art as not being tasteless is getting harder and harder.
Posted By:
Trygon_Predator
(1/27/2013 9:50:13 PM)
Pretty good no frills flyer. I can't get over the goofy crotch thrusting in the Gatecrash art though. “Hello, this is Hard Gay! Hoooooo!!!”
Posted By:
RPGfan
(2/13/2013 8:28:47 PM)
This is one of the few creatures with flying, in which the art does not explain how the creature flies whatsoever. Looking close I can see she is mounted on some kind of animal, but have no idea what the animal is. We have to assume from context that it does indeed have wings.
Her face is incredibly realistic though, props to the artist for that. Also 2/2 flying haste for 3 is more then you can ask for in a creature. 4.5/5, great little common.
Posted By:
TheWrathofShane
(4/10/2013 1:14:15 AM)