x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 1.803 / 5  (61 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
123 >
Millennial Gargoyle, you're 13 years late. It's 2013 now, not 2000.
Posted By: azure_drake222222 (2/3/2013 9:54:16 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Anyone remember the show Gargoyles? This totally looks like Lexington the little one with the armpit glider wings :D

I used to have a recurring nightmarish dream as a kid that involved gargoyles that looked JUST like this guy outside of my windows.
Posted By: lorendorky (1/22/2013 4:26:27 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


We just got Primal Clay which does this and much more. Why couldn't they at least add something to this to make it more than a desperate limited flier.
Posted By: Moxxy (1/22/2013 8:58:35 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I can't complain really.
I remember Vassal Soul being a decent problem in RtR limited, so having one that doesn't need to worry about mana-costs isn't going to go last pick.

It IS only used for limited fodder, though. Don't think about playing it in any other format.
Posted By: Ferlord (1/23/2013 11:33:01 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Too bad this is the only Gargoyle in Gatecrash. I was under the impression there would be more, considering the Orzhov guild is in this set. No excuses, Wizards, we all saw the Orzhov gargoyles in Shrieking Affliction
Posted By: NuckChorris (1/25/2013 6:52:14 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


How bad is this?
Skinwing is almost strictly better.
THAT'S how bad this card is.
Posted By: FatalEagle (2/6/2013 3:00:23 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Between this and Lumengrid Gargoyle, we should be seeing a 5 3/3 flying artifact creature someday. The only question is: would it be common?
Posted By: HuntingDrake (2/15/2013 11:46:15 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I think this is somewhat underrated, it's not great but being colourless you can play it in any deck, and it is flying. That's flexible in draft and worthwhile taking to pack out your creatures, but only in limited. You won't see this being used elsewhere.
Posted By: HowardTreesong (3/3/2013 9:48:15 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Primal Clay is an uncommon. And they are both Artifacts. that actually matters. Primal Clay would honestly make a fair rare, although it would on the low end for rares. Primal Clay at uncommon AND colorless is pretty far above the usual curves actually. It's definitely an "A+" card among uncommons.

I think Gatherer tends to grade cards all wonky- it has to be at least an A+ in Limited or you don't even give it 3 stars. NOT EVERY CARD CAN BE A+! Your game that you love so much would die a horrible death if the next set, they released only cards that are A+ in Limited or better. It would obsolete every common that previously existed, would kill most desires for reprints, enough so that to please the people that still want them, it wouldn't be profitable enough for Wizards to do because not enough would exist, and a big piece of the Market would crash, and that would deflate the rares, and then you have Power Creep and a Market Crash, and NOBODY is happy AT ALL. Better, much better, **e... (see all)
Posted By: DarthParallax (3/15/2013 12:50:44 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


What's the term opposite of powercreep?
Well, whatever it is, this is it.
Posted By: Dabok (1/22/2013 4:13:28 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0