There are no comments yet for this card.
Not bad if you want consistency running 3 plus colors, but otherwise, meh.
Posted By:
Purplerooster
(1/23/2013 6:48:08 PM)
Another bland Ravnican artifact. Move on to the next card.
Posted By:
Totema
(1/22/2013 9:09:05 PM)
This would have been bad in 1994. Primal Clay is strictly better.
@azure_drake222222: 12 years late. The millennium started in 2001.
Posted By:
Continue
(2/5/2013 10:06:05 AM)
This card is all flavor. I can't seem to figure out a good use for him in the actual game though. I feel like he should have had at least 1 more toughness and costed 1 less.
Posted By:
BlueBodies
(2/1/2013 12:04:17 AM)
Too bad it wasn't a 2/3, it would wall more fliers, and it could slip into a random heartless summoning deck.
Posted By:
Oatbran
(1/24/2013 7:55:13 AM)
This reminds me of an oldschool artifact. A little more expensive than it should be, but you never have to worry about colored mana. Classic, however not really useful outside of limited.
Posted By:
niallcmurray86
(1/24/2013 4:20:24 PM)
@Dabok - maybe it could be coined as Gargoyle-ing? Millenniation?
seriously, I would rather have them include a card I could keep track of life totals on than see this in a pack
Posted By:
Curlie-Joe
(1/25/2013 11:50:42 AM)
Exactly fair for a common artifact. Nothing fancy to see here. Draft it and put it in your sealed deck, otherwise ignore it.
Limited fodder. And that's not a complaint. I like limited filler.
Posted By:
NoobOfLore
(1/26/2013 5:51:33 PM)
Not completely terrible... if you're really desperate for a flyer, 4-drop, or 2/2 in limited if you get stuck with a weak pool. ...Yeah okay, I guess that's weak huh.
Posted By:
hordeofgoons
(1/28/2013 11:25:02 AM)
I've gotten like three of these in boosters and each time all I can think is "wow, this is the worst card I've seen in this set." So overcosted for so little usability.
Posted By:
Smoke_Stack
(2/5/2013 12:19:17 PM)