Please reprint me in a core set, with the same art and flavor text.
Posted By:
Giant_Caterpillar
(7/20/2010 3:56:39 PM)
"Why doesn't a giant caterpillar turn into a giant butterfly?"
It's as strong as an Icatian infantry unit; that's gotta be a damn big butterfly.
Posted By:
scumbling1
(3/15/2011 1:26:37 PM)
I love this card for no other reason than that it is flavourful and cool, as well as mostly functional. It is two creatures for one, sorta, and the 3/3 body is surprisingly beefy. It is also useful that the Butterfly has flying. Would probably be my favourite of all time if the Butterfly was also 3/3. The flavour text is great too, and I prefer this art to the Masques art. Doesn't quite make sense as is. 5/5 for all-round fun.
Posted By:
ClockworkSwordfish
(1/30/2010 5:13:31 PM)
Why doesn't a giant caterpillar turn into a giant butterfly?
Posted By:
Andromeiylochk
(11/11/2010 12:42:00 AM)
If it turned into a giant butterfly token it would automatically have the giant creature type, right? Even though it obviously isn't a giant.
I imagine that's probably why, but I could be wrong. I mean we're talking about Visions here.
I would prefer a revamped reprint where you got the butterfly even it goes to the graveyard, rather than having to sac and pay.
Posted By:
Baconradar
(10/31/2011 6:00:38 AM)
Strictly more ridiculous than Goblin Game. How charming though. Maybe it could go in a deck with Emerald Dragonfly.
Posted By:
The_Erudite_Idiot
(9/30/2013 12:25:05 PM)
if this was 5 for a 4/4 with its ability resulting in a 2/2 flyer that'd be cool, too. Still though, this card is fun.
Posted By:
ZaisConsultant
(5/16/2014 1:43:25 PM)