This thing passes the vanilla test with flying colors. I hope to draft a lot of these guys in M14 Limited.
Posted By:
B0rb0rkymos
(7/9/2013 6:22:27 PM)
Batterhorn's distant cousin?
Posted By:
CosmicDragon
(7/12/2013 9:14:52 AM)
Thragtusk stats that can be cast before Thragtusk. Without the Advocate this is still fine, because you'll most likely be attacking anyway.
Posted By:
Purplerooster
(7/18/2013 8:15:28 AM)
I like it. Most card that require you to do stuff at the beginning of your turn full on REQUIRE you-or else you don't get to use it. But this isn't crippled by not having Advocate of the Beast.
Posted By:
DaLucaray
(7/9/2013 4:14:54 PM)
The "names matter" mechanic has been seen previously, here and there. See Kookus, for example.
Posted By:
Bouchart
(7/10/2013 7:45:28 PM)
Fine for limited. For constructed it's meh.
Posted By:
majinara
(7/18/2013 12:24:57 PM)
This new "names matter" mini mechanic is irritating. It reminds me too much of Yu-Gi-Oh. At least it's less stupidly restrictive.
Posted By:
Totema
(7/9/2013 5:10:10 PM)
Having never played Yu-Gi-Oh, I enjoy the "names matter" thing. In this case it inspires multicolor decks, and in other cases they're just fun to play.
Posted By:
Layk
(7/9/2013 7:34:48 PM)
It is a 4 mana 5/3. Not terrible for aggro decks and for limited will be a game changer with the Advocate of the Beast. Still... Woulda liked it to have 1 extra toughness. Woulda been a nice reminder of cuddly 'lil Woolly Thoctar.
Posted By:
HotHit
(7/12/2013 6:19:34 PM)
Why not just play Juggernaut? They are essentially the same card, except Juggernaut is an artifact (which is mostly a benefit), can't be blocked by Walls (however minor a benefit that is), and doesn't need a 
card (when it requires a heavy commitment to 
) to lose a minor drawback that, frankly, doesn't need to be lost.
Posted By:
Tiggurix
(7/12/2013 6:50:39 PM)