x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 3.194 / 5  (36 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
123 >
This isn't as bad as it looks. A 4/4 beater for 4 is okay in Limited, but you're still going to want Kalonian Tusker instead.
Posted By: SyntheticDreamer (7/9/2013 8:04:05 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Unconditional 4/4 for 4 at common. Not exactly nifty for pauper, but still we don't get to see it that often. 3/5 from me for that.
Posted By: Guest1381794618 (7/10/2013 10:56:15 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I understand why people aren't all excited about this card, but honestly this card is extremely solid in limited. Green needs stuff like this at common - a 4/4 for 4 with no drawback and fairly easy color-requirement in a 2-color deck is incredibly solid given that some of the most comparable cards are either higher rarity, multi-colored (Rhox Brute), or only have 3-toughness (Crowned Ceratok).

The common-rarity is a huge deal in limited formats - usually allowing a green player access to multiple highly-efficient (if somewhat unexciting) creatures.
Posted By: Saraneth888 (7/16/2013 12:03:14 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Very strong filler card for limited. Won me a pre-release with this superior early game common creature.
Posted By: TheWrathofShane (7/15/2013 12:23:38 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


You guys can pass me this in M14 limited all day long. Probably not first pickable but defiantly a solid team player that will take you to the end. 4/5 limited card. I don't really understand the point of comparing this to mythic rares and other constructed playable cards.
Posted By: FirstPrime (8/6/2013 12:30:32 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Ladies and gentlemen, I give you not one, but TWO BEARS!
Posted By: DoragonShinzui (8/14/2013 4:53:16 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Understandable as a vanilla creature. Still, it should have been only one colored mana.
Posted By: Pendulous (7/9/2013 4:28:30 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


{3}{G} or trample would have been nice. But hey, bad cards are essential.
Posted By: DaLucaray (7/9/2013 4:32:32 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It surprises me how many are bashing this vanilla 4/4 four-drop.
I'm usually the first one to complain about commons that could have been better, but this seems perfectly fine.

Allso notice how it is strictly better than Erithizon, which was rare.
...admittedly, that's been a while.

But out of all three 4/4 Baloths for 2GreenGreen (yes, we do in fact have that many),
this Rumbling one is strictly worse than the Obstinate one and the Ravenous one, though.
Posted By: Mode (7/13/2013 12:19:05 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Could have been a 5/5 or cost 1GreenGreen, but as it is, on-curve vanilla beater for limited. I know I'd be be happy playing it in that environment.
Posted By: Trygon_Predator (7/11/2013 2:17:45 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0