Seeing the new art and flavor text made me think she was some sort of contract-maker. Rubinia Soulsigner instead of Soulsinger. It even fits with the card's effects. I need to read more carefully.
Posted By:
JSSarfin
(10/29/2013 3:26:40 PM)
Only you can hear me, Summoner.
Posted By:
Ferlord
(10/29/2013 9:40:15 PM)
@RAV004: 1. Soulsinger doesn't actually fly. 2. Faeries aren't inherently minute; how short do you think Oona was?
Posted By:
SkyknightXi
(10/30/2013 6:01:17 AM)
Wait, this wasn't on the reserved list?
Posted By:
Continue
(10/30/2013 9:43:43 PM)
I was wondering why she seemed so familiar. Functionally similar to Merieke Ri Berit
Posted By:
Syrtees
(11/5/2013 8:20:10 AM)
For all of you wondering about the soulsinger/soulsigner mixup: the artist drew what was requested: Rubinia Soulsigner. Fortunately, the art still looks pretty good.
As for the card: I probably wouldn't play her as my general: while playing other peoples' decks is fun, it's more of a UB thing anyway. I would, however, include her in most decks that can play her. In EDH, there's almost certainly going to be something worth grabbing. If you have a sac. outlet, even better.
Posted By:
Aremath
(11/6/2013 10:03:18 PM)
Such exquisite art.
Posted By:
TheVizier
(10/29/2013 3:08:51 PM)
The art is beautiful and I think this is a very cool card to reprint in the new border but, as JSSarfin mentioned, both the new art and flavor text easily bring up a misreading of her name as Soulsigner. It makes me wonder if the art-director made that mistake on commisioning the new artwork.
Posted By:
Haze01
(10/30/2013 11:26:02 AM)
Very good job giving this card a makeover. Cleaned up the rules text, and more importantly, gave it serviceable art!
Posted By:
Kryptnyt
(11/4/2013 2:57:21 PM)
This is the Art we need, but its not the art we deserve.
Posted By:
Rancid_Raptor
(11/8/2013 1:32:15 PM)