x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.077 / 5  (26 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
12 >
So this lets you do a total of 12 damage? 3 each to 2 target creatures AND 3 each to 2 target players, one of which could be a planeswalker? That's how the "and/or" works, right? You can choose. Otherwise it would just be "or"...
Posted By: ghost-mutt (1/29/2014 11:58:35 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


still more playable than boulderfall
Posted By: Flyheight (1/29/2014 9:43:58 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


The illustration looks like the artwork for some kind of "Elemental" creature.
Posted By: Tiggurix (1/30/2014 2:59:59 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


It's good it says "Creatures and/or players". Otherwise, it'd probably one of the worst cards in this set.

Right now, it's mediocre limited removal. People will definitely play something that can kill a creature, even if it costs 6. The fact that it can kill two creatures means it can be the game finisher that player needs. Although not truly comparable, Sea God's Revenge showed us just how fantastically powerful multiple-creature "removal" can be in limited.

Don't get me wrong: if it were "6 damage divided as you wish", everyone would praise the god(s). Adding instant-speed to it would've helped significantly. Right now, it's nothing special. It's just not as bad as it seems.
Posted By: Ferlord (1/28/2014 6:24:21 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


You know, for common/uncommon, rarity should not be an indicator of power level. Technically it makes sense for some of the worst cards to be uncommon rather than common, as that means they show up far less in draft and sealed.
Posted By: Taudisban (1/30/2014 9:57:56 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Kills two creatures in limited, gonna be underrated. It is a two-for-one.
Posted By: anotherfan321 (1/29/2014 8:33:51 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I rated this 0.5/5 initially, but I'm bumping it up to 1/5 because it is at least a half-decent spell for Limited. I don't like it, but I'll play it. Really wish it were common though.
Posted By: Continue (1/31/2014 12:54:15 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Card name doubles as the reaction to finding it in a pack you paid money for. Mount Sulano isn't the only thing erupting in anger.

Posted By: Vogie (2/3/2014 2:12:06 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Contender for worst card of the set, thanks to uncommon.
Posted By: Lord_of_Tresserhorn (1/28/2014 5:10:02 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


@ghost-mutt I think you almost have the right idea and everyone else is underestimating this card.
It either reads:
"Pinnacle of Rage deals 3 damage to each of two target creatures and players."
or
"Pinnacle of Rage deals 3 damage to each of two target creatures or players."
So, (as I understand it in this rather complicated and wordy card) this means:
In multiplayer, this can deal two damage to two creatures and two players/planeswalkers, but not to both a planeswalker and the player who controls it.
or
In a regular one on one duel, this can deal (maximally) 3 damage to each of two creatures plus 3 damage to the opposing player or planeswalker plus three damage to you or a planeswalker you control. If you don't target yourself or one of your own planeswalkers, then this can only choose two targets.
Will a dci sanctioned judge please tell me if I am right or wrong?
(If I have the right of things, 5/5 from me.)
Posted By: Phelplan (2/27/2014 11:50:33 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0