It's an old card, that doesn't measure up to modern shroud givers. That's about all you can say.
Purely nostalgic
Posted By:
Arachobia
(6/17/2011 10:11:03 PM)
None of the shroud givers destroy exsiting auras. This does. So play it on your Pacifismed beater.
Posted By:
tavaritz
(7/6/2011 3:36:20 AM)
I have a big problem with putting greaves on stuff that doesn't have legs, but i'l still never use this.
Posted By:
Laguz
(7/3/2010 8:58:50 AM)
If you really want the effect in an aura, use Robe of mirror.
Posted By:
Ombrenuit
(7/11/2009 7:56:25 PM)
Just use Lightning Greaves. Costs less, needs no colored mana, gives haste, doesn't get destroyed when the creature it's on dies...
Posted By:
majinara
(2/6/2009 5:58:12 AM)
Like others have said, this is just beaten out by at least a dozen cards. The cost is too high and the wording too weird. In the rare event that you can't use shroud on something for a combo, there are still cheaper cards with the new hexproof ability.
Posted By:
Enelysios
(3/26/2012 1:00:49 AM)
strictly worse than.... well..... anything that gives shroud
Posted By:
allmighty_abacus
(6/20/2010 11:24:15 AM)
...or use Shielding Plax with supershroud and get a new card.
Posted By:
holgir
(9/17/2009 8:13:37 AM)
M14 rulechange makes it so that Oblivion Ring/Detention Sphere/Seismic Assault can target the enchanted creature, but if a creature or artifact spell were to try and target (do any exist?) while on the stack, enchanted creature isn't a valid target now. You can't cheat auras onto the enchanted creature anymore (via Sun Titan et al). Not sure how much it's worth, but there you have it.
Posted By:
minorfffanatic1
(7/15/2013 2:16:29 AM)
Play it on your opponent's Bruna, Light of Alabaster or Zur the Enchanter and watch them rage
Posted By:
LordRandomness
(4/17/2014 4:01:11 AM)