A little bit better than it looks, just because it can be a 2/2 flier for 3, the limited firebreathing does make it a lot weaker for agressive decks.
Posted By:
Drecon84
(2/25/2009 8:05:59 AM)
If you think about it as a 2/2 flier for 3 with an upkeep cost of 1R it's obviously crap. Obviously it's optional but still a terrible card
Posted By:
s0phocles
(7/8/2009 6:27:23 PM)
Holy Richard Garfield, it's a drake so weak he can't handle a simple Firebreathing.
Posted By:
Weretarrasque
(9/25/2009 8:07:37 AM)
I'd like them to reprint this, honestly. It's not a powerful card, but I love the art and the way the card is. It really should have had full firebreathing, though.
Posted By:
Jannissary
(7/5/2013 2:53:39 PM)