x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0
Community Rating: 2.881 / 5  (42 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

 
Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
 stars.
 >
'Interception' was one of my favorite keywords (well it isn't quite, as it isn't an abbreviation for anything, such as exile or bury), but it is elegant, yet not in the way 'bury' and 'exile' is simple.
Posted By: AlphaNumerical (8/31/2009 6:04:15 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


See, this was back in the old days when creatures sometimes had drawbacks and anything that cost 6 or more wasn't just a card that basically said "Kill this in 2 turns or less or I win" on it.
Posted By: Guest1590352645 (1/6/2014 10:09:54 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I like saying Interception after i Block.
Posted By: inmypants22 (8/24/2009 8:40:52 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


This was made during the days when Wizards decided that Serra Angel and Shivan Dragon were above the power curve that they wanted for creatures (yes, in this day and age of Baneslayer Angel that quaint bygone notion of what creature power should be seems laughable), and boy does it show.
Posted By: Gishra (11/2/2010 8:02:05 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


When your paying six mana for a creature shouldn't you be getting something better than this? A 5/4 for 6 mana is usually never worth paying for, and the only ability it has is that it cn't block creatures with-out flying. Which is really irritating when it should come into play with a functional ability that can actually do something; not this piece of crap effect where it limits the number of creatures it blocks.
Posted By: SavageBrain89 (6/15/2009 4:15:23 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I really like the artwork for it. But that's about it.
Posted By: Zulp (5/2/2010 4:32:58 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Reprinted as Cloud Djinn.
Posted By: tavaritz (7/12/2011 7:14:10 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


I like Inception.
Posted By: garbagegatherer (9/26/2010 12:10:26 AM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0

 


Does anyone notice that its creature type is not "dragon", but just "creature"?
Posted By: Destroy2777 (8/5/2012 1:36:12 PM)
Rating: 
0.51.01.52.02.53.03.54.04.55.0