x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 4.095 / 5  (42 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
I disagree. Sure you can search for any land... but this costs one less to play.. seeing as the land comes in to play untaped. This is much better.
Posted By: Kryplixx (11/1/2009 9:17:06 PM)


i like how it doesnt say "basic" forest, so you can grab out those dual and shock lands you want, if you are running more than one colour
Posted By: Havens (8/17/2010 5:17:26 AM)


Nice how it puts it into play untapped. That essentially means you get to increase the number of lands you have in play for a single green mana. That's a good deal.
Posted By: jsttu (1/17/2011 9:43:18 AM)


@A3Kitsune: Don't forget Murmuring Bosk.
Posted By: Axelle (5/18/2011 4:56:57 PM)


rampant growth < nature's lore
Posted By: thaviel (9/17/2009 12:35:06 PM)


You use this to search for duel lands, Dryad Arbor or Sapseep Forest.
Posted By: A3Kitsune (6/16/2010 1:25:54 AM)


today must be Nature's Lore day for me....

This is neither better nor worse than rampant growth. This fetches duals and effectively cost 1 since the forest comes into play untapped. So major points for this card, yes.

Rampant growth would be better in a deck with out access to dual lands, and one that is in need of a land that is not a forest.

Both have their place, and while this one is generally better, there are many viable reasons where a rampant growth would be better.

Lastly, Kryplixx the "<" means is less than... you basically agreed with thaviel even though you thought you were disagreeing with him.
Posted By: Bbone37 (3/23/2014 8:15:46 AM)