This card needs to be reverted to the original text - the new text is difficult to read, difficult to understand, and it completely loses it's flavor.
Posted By:
combomaster
(12/9/2009 7:42:39 PM)
Is it just me or does the Oracle text completely change how this is used? AND it makes i much more confusing.
Posted By:
BuffJittePLZ
(4/25/2011 12:37:08 PM)
hahahaha this is sweet.
Posted By:
metalevolence
(10/21/2009 1:21:15 AM)
Kind of a confusing card at first, but I could see it being fun to play in a casual environment.
Posted By:
person1234
(8/17/2009 1:39:14 PM)
The art makes this look not so much camoflage as near-Invisibility. Thermo-optic camoflage, maybe.
Posted By:
A3Kitsune
(3/22/2010 4:13:47 AM)
Agreed on the text.
Posted By:
Ibn_Shisha
(6/16/2010 6:41:09 PM)
Oracle text is way more confusing than the original one
Posted By:
bagilis
(9/15/2010 6:13:29 AM)
...really? WOTC still uses "piles" for official wordings?
Though, I can't see a third way to word this...
Posted By:
Mata-nui3
(2/11/2011 10:43:10 PM)
Morph means that the attackers can't be "face down" any more. If you attacked with a face-up morph creature, you would get another activation out of him. If you attack with a face-down morph creature, you get a free, involuntary activation. That's why this is now "sort into piles and have opponent block a pile at random."
Posted By:
longwinded
(5/20/2011 7:18:16 PM)
I think the new text also clarifies that would happen with your tokens as well. but it does sound like a headache to play
Posted By:
BryceCarmony
(8/21/2013 5:34:27 PM)