x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 3.609 / 5  (46 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
12 >
At least he seems a bit more competent than his goblin counterpart.
Posted By: CrazyLou (12/7/2010 6:36:10 AM)


Combine with Soldier of Fortune!
Posted By: Mudbutt_on (4/6/2010 10:26:19 PM)


Seems a bit underrated, especially for a red-card.

Note that it doesn't say 'Reveal' the top 3 cards, it just says to look at them. You don't have to show your opponent what's on their library, nor do you need to show what's on yours.
Posted By: capt.pantsless (9/20/2011 1:10:02 PM)


Much much more fun in multiplayer. You're not allowed to announce non-public information to the other players, so you can't tell everyone what's coming down the pike -- but you are allowed to snicker or bite your lip.
Posted By: Salient (3/4/2012 8:12:54 PM)


This was my random card. I loved this card with Elemental Augury.
Posted By: WOTC_MikeTurian (4/16/2009 5:11:09 PM)


I guess this isn't too bad if you're going for something with needing to guess the next card of a library.
Posted By: Ryney (8/17/2010 11:20:11 PM)


Interesting that this is red. Gives some depth to the color, I suppose.
Posted By: BongRipper420 (9/4/2012 5:51:12 PM)


madblind mountain
Posted By: garabor (4/2/2011 1:42:58 PM)


Note that this is not library manipulation, for those who are unaware you just look at the top three and put them back in the same order.

Anyway, this seems like a good casual card as it can act as a bit of a preemptive reveal hand... thing. Also with your own library you can shuffle away, making it a bit like a terrible ponder.

Cool stuff. 3.5/5
Posted By: MCcreator (10/25/2013 11:34:08 AM)


Library manipulation for {R}? Usually that is a more blue mechanic. Would be a stellar (possibly broken) if it allowed you to reorder the cards.
Posted By: tcollins (1/16/2011 11:56:36 PM)