Not even a 2/1?
Posted By:
Forgeling
(8/24/2009 10:27:45 AM)
Hahaha i wann meet the guy who thought Mons Goblin Raiders and Raging Goblin were just OP, and needed a downgrade haha
Posted By:
Omenchild
(12/28/2009 10:14:52 PM)
Wow. It's a 1/1 for 1... let's give it a drawback, then !
Posted By:
Belz_
(3/12/2011 2:35:44 PM)
Pretty terrible goblin
Posted By:
Guest1392057160
(4/7/2010 4:22:33 PM)
"I sure wish Mons would hire me...."
Posted By:
Kirbster
(9/4/2010 4:47:25 PM)
I think whoever made this didn't actually care about the card, they just wanted a goblin with a cyber-spear or whatever that is.
Posted By:
NuckChorris
(11/12/2011 7:55:02 AM)
Wait...what? Stricly worse than Mons's Goblin Raiders? I seriously think this is so blantantly bad that something should have been done about it.
Posted By:
InfernoTowel
(10/3/2009 12:09:17 PM)
This card actually manages to be worse than Mons's Goblin Raiders. In fact, the only thing this has on the Raiders is the Warrior type, but Warriors aren't exactly the tribe with the widest support.
Posted By:
Filby
(6/14/2009 4:46:22 AM)
I feel this would be an excellent card to "Relentless-ize".
IE, if you like this card AT. ALL., you probably like it enough to want to play 20 of them in your deck.
Maybe not quite the most efficient way to make lots of Goblins...but I like that idea more than Empty the Warrens, for some reason. :P
I'm wierd.
Posted By:
DarthParallax
(5/6/2013 12:49:28 AM)
1/1 for 1 mana with a drawback?!? What where they thinking?!?
Posted By:
Redaspect
(2/19/2011 5:55:58 AM)