It's like Spineless Thug, except it's terrible.
Posted By:
Test-Subject_217601
(9/18/2010 8:03:44 PM)
Nimana Sell-Sword or synergy with swarmyard? Oh choices.
Posted By:
Tommy9898
(3/17/2011 7:42:15 PM)
There is no reason for this, unless R+D let their kids design cards for a day. No, even children would know better than this.
Posted By:
blindthrall
(3/17/2011 3:15:52 PM)
If he was as good as he is cool-looking, Type 1 would have been changed forever. As is, his bulky shell only serves to cram 10-cent bins.
Posted By:
Kirbster
(6/20/2012 7:09:59 PM)
To be more specific - Black was notorious for having drawbacks on creatures that would be mediocre-at-best even without the drawback. See Serpent Warrior, Foul Imp, Spineless Thug, etc.
Nowadays black is just notorious for resembling a Twilight fanfic. I really hope Il Barone returns and whips them all into line...
Posted By:
nibelheim_valesti
(6/24/2010 6:53:35 AM)
I know this guy... who swears by these... says "You have to admit there a good card to own" to which I replied "NO! I DON'T. Not even in an insect deck."
Also said "There good when you catch someone off guard and attack." after which he decided not to attack while we were all wide open.
I tried my best to explain to him why I'd rather use anything else but he took the old "Well I dont own that card" excuse. So I pointed out that he left out his Skeletal Crocodiles that he did indeed own. Not only do they cost the same, but they can block and usually kill at 5 power. Also they hit harder during that "good when you catch someone off guard" crap he mentioned.
Why can't some people understand good old logic...
Ok, my rant is over.
Posted By:
XTwistedsoulX
(9/4/2010 10:02:40 PM)
a 3/3 for {3}{B} with a drawback? why?
Posted By:
Forgeling
(8/25/2009 12:57:28 PM)
I doubt this card sees any play.
Posted By:
Silverware
(8/28/2009 7:29:40 PM)
Useless
Posted By:
VoidedNote
(3/4/2010 9:13:41 PM)
I use these and Grimclaw Bats for all my proxies.
Posted By:
themlsna
(6/5/2010 8:07:41 PM)