x If you're looking for a specific comment, check the other printings as well.
Player Rating:
Community Rating: 1.607 / 5  (42 votes)
The player rating is the overall rating for the card taking into account all player rating votes.

Popular Comments
Hide Comments
Only show me comments rated:
@KnightLord77: Wizards is required to make crap cards. Not every card can be tournament worthy, and not every card is meant to appeal to every player, as evidenced by the Timmy/Johnny/Spike characters. Some cards have to be better than others, and sometimes this difference creates a truly abysmal card. While this card is bad, it isn't unplayable. it could potentially be used in an modular deck for some evasion, and there are always shenanigans to mess with the counters. Plus, it is a colorless artifact, so it is playable in any deck. The trick is to figure out where the drawback can be beneficial.

This still isn't a very good card though
Posted By: jsttu (1/17/2011 1:21:40 PM)


come on with proliferate out there whats to stop you
Posted By: penguinmage25 (11/14/2011 2:23:10 PM)


Or Phantom Monster?
Posted By: achilleselbow (3/26/2010 1:13:03 PM)


Esper Cormorants is usually better.
Posted By: Champion_Kitsune (11/9/2009 7:20:28 PM)


Robo Condors Babay!
Posted By: MasterOfEtherium (7/15/2010 3:40:19 PM)


should have called this card robot storm crow v1.4
Posted By: ttian (3/24/2009 7:20:05 AM)


I agree with rillaan - everything about this card is just plain awful. It's as if MTG is forced to make 10-20 useless cards per set. In general, paying 4 CMC for a 3/3 Flyer would be acceptable, but to have the creature lose a +1/+1 counter each time it attacks OR blocks??? Come on, Guys. Why...just, why?
Posted By: KnightLord77 (10/7/2010 5:24:02 PM)


Posted By: JoshGuessed (7/15/2010 12:46:43 PM)