When I first started playing the game, I had a few of these and thought they were the coolest ever, because the art was sweet and they were so big. I really didn't understand that a 7/4 for 8 was never worth it. New players will think the craziest things sometimes.
Posted By:
Zulp
(10/7/2010 7:12:16 PM)
try using it with some Krosan Drovers. i have four of these, with 4 Krosan Drovers. for 2 green mana their a peach.
Posted By:
GreatWulf
(4/13/2010 6:52:52 PM)
Ofcourse it seems truely useless...
but alas, morph makes just about anything playable.
That's just how cool morph is.
Posted By:
face-fister
(1/10/2012 6:36:52 PM)
yeah...the morph cost on this makes it kinda pointless eh...makes more sense to just replace it with a Scaled Wurm
Posted By:
N84M09
(8/5/2009 9:11:11 PM)
I'm With Zulp Right When I Started I Loooked At The Art Than That 7. And i was thinking this was one of the best cards.
Posted By:
MasterOfEtherium
(1/15/2011 9:47:25 AM)
This was one of the big creatures that I saw when I started playing Magic, and thought "Wow! That's so awesome, I wish I had that card!"
Now I realise how totally awful it truly is.
Posted By:
fibonacci112358
(1/14/2012 1:00:46 AM)
now morphing cards are the bomb, ya stick em in a deck with cards that remove and return a creature, you can get any morgh card out with 4-5 mana now (that includes playing the 3 to play it face down) only problem is ya dont get the face up effect on them
Posted By:
Ava_Adore
(6/6/2010 4:43:07 AM)
Play it morphed, then astral slide it, or flickerwisp it.
You know, if you already have an Akroma, Angel of Fury and four Imperial Hellkites and you want a few more morph creatures to cheat face up.
Yeah, the absolute nicest thing you can say about this is that it is the third best morph creature to flicker.
Posted By:
kiseki
(10/14/2011 4:50:45 PM)
What's the difference between a Bulvox and a Baloth? We may never know.
Posted By:
TheArchive
(1/17/2013 10:56:06 AM)