Do a search for things more than two, and less than three. They exist.
Posted By:
Tynansdtm
(1/26/2011 10:05:50 AM)
I love how you can just wipe out a token horde, but leave your big guys untouched, or kill the enemy fatties to swing in with your token hordes.
Posted By:
Shieldman
(6/15/2010 6:25:19 PM)
never, EVER pay the entwine. Use it for one sided kills by making sure that all your guys fall in one catagory and the other guys fall in the other. Such as having humility in play a long with multiple things that make all your creatures more powerful. Then all your guys are at least 3/3's while everyone else's are 1/1's.
ya still crap for that much mana and so hard to make useful, but it isnt point less.
Posted By:
bijart_dauth
(3/10/2011 4:07:18 PM)
This card has received a lot of low ratings, but I think it is significantly better than that. Yes, it costs more than a simple Wrath of God. No, I wouldn't run it in a regular 60-card deck, because it's just too slow. But in EDH format, this card is awesome. Building up to six mana in EDH is no problem, and having the option of wiping out all of your opponents' big fatties while leaving yours in play is beautiful. Even better is having the option to destroy your opponents' token horde instead, while leaving your big fatties on the field, if that's how you play. And in a really dire situation, you can pay the entwine cost and get a full Wrath effect. A creature wipe that can target without targeting is nothing to scoff at.
Posted By:
TheMurderousKitten
(8/12/2011 10:28:16 AM)
And then Austere Command came along. Oh well.
Posted By:
Goatllama
(10/12/2012 10:12:39 AM)
This is like a terrible austere command
Posted By:
metalevolence
(8/17/2011 1:52:17 PM)
that's not very lunar
Posted By:
Hydrogoose
(3/15/2009 6:53:04 AM)
Pay 6 mana and sacrifice two lands to destroy all creatures... yeah. I'd prefer much more to use Wrath of God, or at least Austere Command for a similar effect with more options.
Posted By:
Daikoru
(8/13/2010 4:37:49 PM)
UM yeah 8====D
prick
Posted By:
@go
(10/3/2009 9:34:01 PM)